A political storm is growing as President Joe Biden faces heat for using an autopen to sign off on a wave of clemency orders. Many are now asking: Did Biden truly approve these decisions?
In a statement to the New York Times, the President said, “I made every single decision.” According to Biden, the autopen was just a tool to speed up the signing process. Critics, however, argue that using a machine for such serious matters is irresponsible.
What Is an Autopen?
An autopen is a machine that copies a person’s signature. It’s often used for routine letters or ceremonial documents. But using it on clemency orders—life-changing legal actions—has stirred controversy.
The debate isn’t new. In 2011, President Obama used an autopen to renew the Patriot Act, which also drew backlash. Even so, legal experts generally accept autopen use when done under direct authorization.
Why It Matters Now
This time, critics point to the gravity of the decisions. Clemency affects people’s lives and freedom. Many believe it deserves a personal touch from the President—not a machine.
The White House insists that Biden read each case himself. A spokesperson told Fox News, “There’s no issue here. The president stands by every decision.”
Still, conservative lawmakers have called for more transparency. Some demand a full review of the process.
Experts Weigh In
Legal experts agree that autopen signatures are valid—but caution that they must be used with care.
Professor Marjorie Cohn told Rolling Stone, “Even if it’s legal, people expect personal attention to clemency cases. That’s a fair concern.”
